Categories
Culture

Broadcast Yourself: The End of the British Asian Auteur  

By Aliza Hussain 

It’s 1990, and a 28-year-old Meera Syal walks into Channel 4 commissioner Karin Bambrough’s office with a modest pitch: a comedy about a coachload of British Asian women on a day trip to Blackpool, lifted straight from the outings she used to take with her aunties. She gets about five minutes in before  Bambrough cuts her off with a ‘Mmh, sounds great,’ and greenlights it on the spot. 

At some point during the past decade and a half, we seem to have decided that  the 1990s were a golden age. I’m sick to death of the compulsory nostalgia  loop, but when I hear my parents talking about their youth again, I can’t help  but understand the mythology. The picture comes quickly. It’s the mid 90’s and  you’re young and South Asian in London; it was only twenty-five years ago  that your parents started from scratch in Hounslow, cursing the bare knees  and booze. You grow up not allowed to speak English in the house and wear  your first pair of jeans at the ripe age of seventeen. But that all didn’t matter  now, they were remixing your music and playing it at Ministry of Sound, you  had Talvin Singh winning the Mercury Prize, Apache Indian and Cornershop  on MTV. Nights like Anokha at the Blue Note and Outcaste at Heaven pulled in  mixed crowds. You could buy T-shirts from Club Kali, read about Goodness  Gracious Me in The Face, and hear a dhol loop sampled on Radio 1. For the  first time, the British Asian sensibility felt legible to itself, there was a humour  built on self-consciousness, that diasporic reflex to pre-empt the gaze, to mock  what you love before someone else does. With this came a wave of British  Asian filmmaking that was stylistically self-authored, produced by artists  operating in a space with no market to please.  

Syal’s 1993 Bhaji on the Beach follows a coachload of British Asian women  heading from Birmingham to Blackpool, a trip rendered with warmth and  acuity, and what sounds like a throwaway premise comes, in director  Gurinder Chadha’s hands, a kind of moving chamber piece. The film gathers  women at different stages of life and lets their fault lines rub up against one  another: Asha, whose dutiful calm keeps slipping into lush Bollywood reveries,  Ginder, brittle with the knowledge she might not survive her marriage,  Hashida, gifted and frightened in equal measure, and the older women, who seem so sure of their authority it’s easy to miss the deep fear humming  underneath. 

Blackpool, with its rain slick neon and end-of-the-pier melancholy becomes a  kind of diasporic purgatory, and, like David Leland’s Wish You Were Here or  Andrea Arnold’s Fish Tank, Chadha understands the British seaside as a  liminal space, a landscape that reveals the tension between who the women  are and who they might briefly imagine themselves to be. Chada leans into this  tension formally too, with the deliberately clashing colour palette  externalising how the British and diasporic world never blend, only rubbing  and scraping against one another. Saris flare violently under the North Sea  light, and we are left with a sensory excess that becomes a kind of emotional  distortion, with the environment exaggerating the feelings the women have  learned to mute at home. We see this most clearly in the fairground mirror  scene, where Hashida, pregnant by Oliver, a Black man her family would  never accept, finds her crisis reflected back at her in warped glass, a private  fear becoming theatrically public, with the carnival brightness stretching it  into something almost surreal. 

Ultimately, the cheap magic of Blackpool drains away, leaving the women  back on a Birmingham pavement with nothing resolved, only with the film’s  ending leaving us with the salty aftertaste of a long day. Chadha rejects the  tidy dramaturgy of a social-issue film; her ending is closer to the British New  Wave’s open wounds, but with a reconfigured centre of gravity. Instead of the  working-class man railing against the system, we get women whose interior  lives have simply been made visible, and that visibility is its own form of  political charge. The movie’s themes; double lives, cultural drift, the  choreography of belonging, have since become familiar to the point of cliché,  but only because Syal and Chadha made them possible. 

Around the same time, Hanif Kureishi was scripting My Beautiful Laundrette,  folding Thatcherite greed and queer desire into one clammy Soho bedsit; Asif  Kapadia was reshaping the British epic with The Warrior; and Chadha herself  would soon make it to the mainstream with Bend It Like Beckham. These films,  emerging under the flush of Cool Britannia, were made possible by conditions  that now feel unreal. Public broadcasters still believed in cultural risk;  Channel 4’s minority-voices remit had teeth, the UK Film Council was throwing real money at first-time writers, and London, under the soft-touch optimism of  early New Labour, was busy selling itself as Europe’s great multicultural  experiment. But that civically confident Britain is gone, and what replaced it  could not be less hospitable to that kind of filmmaking. The broader guttering  of working-class film culture, youth theatres, public bursaries, regional  workshops, took this locally rooted, auteur-driven style of British Asian  cinema down with it. What remains isn’t absence but attenuation. It’s not hard  to spot a British Asian face in Netflix’s new wave of London-set diaspora  romances; charming, energetic, but speaking the lingua franca of a global  market where representation is inherently branding. And of course,  immigration has become a permanent election-cycle bogeyman. We’ve lost the  sense of a world built from the inside, and what’s taken its place is a cinema  that performs identity outwardly. It’s telling that the two of the most  interesting British Asian figures of the past decade, Riz Ahmed and Dev Patel,  became themselves elsewhere. Ahmed’s most radical work has been funded  across the Atlantic; Patel’s most substantial roles have come from directors  who aren’t British at all. Their talent is unmistakable, but it has flourished in a  vacuum. Britain grows the artists; it no longer grows the conditions that let  them tell stories at home, and in a landscape where fewer artists can afford to  begin in the margins, this realist, first-generation strand of filmmaking has  dissipated.  

This is where the 90s return in sharper relief. That brief British Asian cultural  boom; the fusion records, the fashion, the films made from inside the  community rather than at its expense was an infrastructure. A moment when  Britain was porous enough, and publicly funded enough, for new voices to  shape the culture rather than just appear within it, as Syal once did. Its  disappearance matters less as a pang of nostalgia than as diagnosis: proof of  how thoroughly we’ve dismantled the conditions that once made artistic risk  possible.

Featured Image: BFI

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *