Categories
Creative Writing

Artist’s Touch

By Rory McAlpine

The fingers were always difficult, and not the proportions, they were the easy part. It was ‘touch’ that was difficult to capture. Hands are full of life, they sculpt and paint, but also wash and cook, stroke and clasp. Without capturing this trait within the fingers, the stone hands would look heavy and fake. Niccolò had always believed it to be in the creases, using his chisel he carved the hand with fine intersecting lines and marks. The constellation of markings gave the hands a history, thus inferring a future activity and imbuing them with that quality of touch. 

Niccolò chiselled his sculptures in one of the west facing rooms of the house, he enjoyed watching the sunsets slink below the ocean, calling the return of its rays that danced like embers on his window. He worked on his sculpture in the early hours of the morning. Before then resting for breakfast with his family, where they often sat on the huge oak table in the garden, his children running around restless as his wife Maria laid down fruits from the orchard, and all around them the smell of lavender would ebb and flow as the borders were coaxed into bloom by spring. He loved the smell of lavender. It made you understand bees; drawn by flowers. The smells: sweet, alluring. 

I don’t wish to give the impression they were a wealthy family. They lived in the large house overlooking the bay, sure, but it was on the brighter and more romantic side of ruin. Crumbling brick, a couple rooms home to the elements, peeling paint and carpets worn by many feet. It was that slightly shabby look not of neglect but of love and history that wore things thin from enjoyment and use. 

When Niccolò got to sculpting the eyes, he had to take particular care. He chiselled one a day turning his sculpture to the window so he could study the patterns of shadow and light on its face at different times. First the incision for the pupil. Then his tools coax an iris to bloom around it. He had to make sure the eyes could see. That was imperative.

Art was a peculiar thing he mused; it was created by the artist then lived on after their death. He thought of all the things his statue would see, all the generations it could observe. Art lives through wars, across generations and revolutions. It could watch his children’s children grow old, and their children. It is easy in this vein of thinking to ask what legacy one’s life will leave. Even a sculpture exists only a tiny portion of time’s reign. But this is a dangerous question to give thought to like exposing fire to air, it hungrily devours it, growing to destroy all that is dear. Looking up at the stars, facing one’s own insignificance is to meet the face of oblivion. One’s life if they are lucky and extraordinary may momentarily cause a ripple in the cosmos. But a ripple is nothing in the churning Pacific Ocean. 

Gazing out his window Niccolò saw his children roll around the grass. Another legacy that would live on. When they sought shade under the apple tree, he and Maria had planted again Niccolò noted, the tree another small legacy that would outlive him. The figure of Maria reading ‘D H Lawrence’s Collected Poems’ on the Juliet balcony of their room, wind tousling her face, so she had to pull the strands from her eyes. Him and Maria shared many legacies. In her hand was the legacy of another whose writing had long outlived him. 

The collective. Was that the answer? After all, a hive is made by a thousand bees. Many stars make a constellation, two people make a child. For one to focus on one’s own life is to isolate a single shade of colour in a painting. Sure, one’s life might only make a ripple in time, but in a generation each individual’s ripple would soon culminate in a wave. 

Niccolò’s finished sculpture showed a figure’s hand outstretched. He pulled a pebble his daughter had brought him from the beach and placed it among the curl of the outstretched fingers. He resolved to put it in some body of water so the pebble would be suspended, ready to be dropped. 

Dropped, to bring forth a ripple. 

Categories
Reviews

Rachel Cusk’s ‘Outline’ Trilogy: 2025’s Version of Meditation

By Martha Thornycroft 

Despite being nearly seven years behind the trend, I started the New Year reading Rachel Cusk’s Kudos (2018), the third in her Outline trilogy. The three books follow a novelist – Faye – as she navigates life as a divorcée and mother to two boys, whilst simultaneously working and juggling a career with personal demands. What makes the trilogy so interesting, however, is how the narrative voice blends into the background (as evidenced by the title Outline), allowing secondary characters to occupy the foreground and transform the narrative with their distinctive voices. Cusk writes the trilogy in such a way that there is no prescribed reading order. This flexibility means that each novel can be approached independently, allowing you to dip in and out of her novels as you wish. It was for exactly this reason that I reached for the final novel, Kudos, around the 1st of January, knowing my reading would contain some much-needed wisdom, and encourage some self-reflection for the New Year.

Cusk’s language is deceptively simplistic, providing profound insights into the human experience. Flicking through my well-thumbed copies, the many dog-eared pages speak volumes. Her books are eminently quotable and almost every chapter contains a universal truth worth remembering. For instance, in Outline, she writes, ’What Ryan had learned from this is that your failures keep returning to you, while your successes are something you always have to convince yourself of.’ As Alexandra Schwartz writes in The New Yorker, the characters in Cusk’s trilogy ‘swoop from the minute banality of personal experience to touch on the great themes of human life and society and back again.’ For this reason, Cusk manages to subtly capture the essence of what it is to be alive in the early 21st century – an elusive sentiment to define, considering that we are still living in it.

Whilst reading Kudos, I was struck by the honesty and frankness of Cusk’s depiction of Faye’s encounters with the various characters she meets, sharing deeply insightful and unfiltered aspects of their life. It made me question the narrator’s role: is the narrative voice (and Cusk herself) analysing the people she meets, or are these characters, in fact, analysing themselves? On this basis, the narrator (and Cusk) seems to occupy a therapist-adjacent status, not only for the novel’s characters but also for the reader. Cusk’s novels invite introspection, where the characters’ process of identifying their faults prompts us to do the same. There is something cathartic in recognising a shared trait in another person – albeit a fictional character. Frequently, while reading the trilogy, I found myself thinking: “Maybe that’s why I behave like that.” or “I know exactly who this reminds me of.” By relating to Cusk’s characters, I gained a more lucid understanding of myself. Therefore, in this sense, her novels have a dual function – serving as both entertainment and self-help novels.

Why do I think this trilogy, particularly Kudos, is pertinent to 2025? In a year coined ‘202thrive’ on social media, I believe it is fair to say that the social culture of wellness and mindfulness is gaining more and more traction – with myself included. Cusk’s novels offer a more feasible way of actioning that New Year’s resolution of being more introspective or aware of how we interact with others. Reading the Outline trilogy is, in my opinion, the ideal way to have a reflective start to 2025.

Categories
Poetry

Absence

By Toby Dossett


The forest holds the language of grief

With a fluency I am yet to master

Saplings bow under the weight of the sky

That speaks only in questions

A stag’s steps are forgotten promises

Moving like the edge of a dream

The shadow of a boy I once knew

Is he watching me like I want him to?

The hawk tears too

Crying, waiting

What does it hunt

If not the silence between us? 

Like when I call the stag

But my voice is a stone that sinks

He tilts his head

I’ve stopped longing and he knows

The laughter we left hanging in the branches

Alike the memories we whispered to the fire

Now dust upon dust

Was it you who taught me

How to carry the weight of an empty clearing

Or was it the wind

Always pulling, always leaving

To become is to mourn

Still, the forest holds us

Roots tangled with absence

Categories
Perspective

Beatnik Meditations – Jesus Was a Beatnik

By Matty Timmis

Now I am not trying to insinuate that being a beatnik is akin to a quasi-religion or a cult; such blind faith, such lack of curiosity, must be diametrically opposed to whatever it may be. Neither am I claiming Jesus was a promiscuous, drug taking chancer scraping together a living with his questioning ideas – that’s for you to judge. What I am trying to communicate is the strange belief in the journey you have to embrace, finding satisfaction in the fact you may never reach your destination, that whatever you are travelling toward may well be a mirage. Implicit in that piece of mind is the notion that you never look in the rear view mirror, that the visceral feeling of movement is sacrosanct, that the horizon, whipping towards you, is all that really matters. As Kerouac said, “nothing behind me, everything ahead of me, as is ever so on the road”.

We met in a very suitable jumping off place, a hostel come campground in a Munich park, heaving with hippies, faded upholstery, guitars and fire pits. Miles and Rory arrived replete with a large tin containing 400g of Golden Virginia and an ambitious quantity of drugs they had smuggled up their arses. We were down and out now, so 10 euro a night to stay in the 100 man communal tent seemed exorbitant. We schemed to pitch our tent in the adjoining campground after dark, hopefully making it free. The problems began after some hash, many steins, and a dismally German dinner consisting solely of sausages; we were hopelessly drunk and it was far too dark to pitch our tent. Luckily, a French man we had been jamming with that evening offered us the underside of his truck to protect us from German weather adversities. We settled down then, taking care not to smash our heads on the axel or the shock absorbers inches above us.

Slightly groggy and a tad grimy, we convened in the morning to formulate a plan. We had come here as ‘beatniks’, with a suitably elusive goal, to find a very special place called the rainbow. We soon learnt however that we were entirely in the wrong part of Germany, the rainbow currently taking place in the black forest in the North. We had to make our way up the length of much of the country, but buses and trains were soon out of the question on account of price, besides we had a beatniks faith, the logical thing to do was to hitchhike.    

Before we departed, ebullient and expeditious, we paid a visit to Aldi where, for cultural as much as economic reasons, we decided to steal as much as we could carry. Sitting at the suburban bus stop out front we inspected our plunder, tucking into a pasta-meat tin. This was not an elegant sight, necessitating a jagged stabbing through the lid, then raising the can to one’s lips, sucking up the cold oily fluid and gelatinous pasta, hoping not to choke on the circumspect white meatballs that bobbed ominous in the broth. Such slurping debauchery felt like a probing of the nihilist depths of counterculture, feeling greasy sauce dripping down from my mouth and off the end of my chin, soaking across my shirt, all whilst 4 or 5 elderly German ladies looked on in stupefied horror. We then jay walked, much to their chagrin, across the street and fixed the traffic with our salute, outstretched thumbs of faith upon the road.

We soon found our first lift, a cherry red convertible AMG Mercedes we both sneered at and revered, our driver the kind of suave, bourgeois epitome we wanted to despise. I suspect however he picked us up for our strange spectacle; 3 shambling beatnik protégés, standing on a small road in hope of a ride 500 miles north. He certainly couldn’t take us that far, apologetically explaining he was only going about 2 miles further. No matter, it was a tantalising start to the journey, top down in the afternoon sunshine,  tearing down the street, elated with the simple speed and power of a snarling engine. Thus deposited at a junction, we made our communion with the road again.

This time we were less successful. Hours went by, our food reserves depleted, and we began to feel the burn of the road in the barren afternoon heat. To restore our faith in the journey we blasted not the frantic amphetamine jazz of our bible, but Willie Nelson’s ‘On the Road Again’ and Canned Heats ‘Going Up the Country’, dancing deranged in the oozing tarmac. Eventually a Mini pulled over and picked us up, transported us a short distance, and ejected us in a cramped and now noxious smelling car at a shopping centre 5 miles further north of Munich. With the now necessary addition of beer, we found ourselves another lift, dourly confident we would still be in Bavaria in the morning.

We were dropped amongst billowing smoke stacks and gurgling, besmirched factories; a desolate industrial estate just a stone’s throw from the first concentration camp, Dachau. At least we had beers now, and the promise of a huge truck stop nearby. In our desperation to escape Bavaria and avoid bedding down in the stark landscape, we rapped on the window of any cab that showed some semblance of occupancy, enquiring in whatever languages we could cobble together if they could take us North, all to no avail. At this point we were weary, particularly tired of lugging our cumbersome packs around with us. But our faith was not to be dimmed and the road, in its clemency, now designed us with the blessing of an abandoned Ikea trolley with which we could cart our bags.

After a final, pleading attempt at hitchhiking in the ebbing sun’s hazy light, standing stately by an arcing flyover, we accepted our hobo fate. Between the autobahn and the industrial estate lay a scraggly patch of brush and woodland, into which we flung ourselves, building a fire and bracing for the night. It was not a comfortable or pleasant sleep, our tent pitched atop a bush, the air within swarming with insects, and the nerves from a recent scabies scare passing between us. A fraught atmosphere helpfully exacerbated by a feral sounding party in the nearby lorry park, it’s strange music throbbing like a ketamine fuelled nightmare amongst the clang of heavy industry.

We felt the down and out sting implicit in ‘beatnik’ when we woke. Our faith in the road was waning, and after failing to secure a lift for the entire morning we felt prepared to abandon it, deciding in anguish to catch a train back to nearby Munich. After being bollocked by a passerby for pushing our trolley off a small bridge in sacrificial farewell, we found ourselves at the station feeling wretched. Across the track was a similarly ragged figure waving at us, squinting in the midday sun. We recognised him for one of the hippies we had met in Munich, someone also planning on attending the rainbow. We regaled him with our pitiful story. Illuminating us with a wry grin he explained he was there to catch a ride north with a girl. He offered to enquire about our situation, and soon we had secured a lift exactly where we wanted to go. We repented, the road had provided.

This lady had the trusting faith of a beatnik, happily driving with 4 men she didn’t know across the country in her friends knackered 2002 Golf. Little more than an hour into the journey, she asked if any of us could drive. I was the only one who had a licence and so she asked me if I had ever driven on European roads before, and if I was happy to drive uninsured. I assured her that I was an experienced driver, but the truth was I had only driven on the motorway once, a long time ago. I was wholly enraptured with faith in the road though, setting off zealously on the derestricted autobahn in blazing afternoon sunshine. I considered it a moral obligation to drive quickly, but, at one point, emerging from a tunnel onto a soaring empty bridge in the shimmering gold of sunset, Rory put on The Prodigy’s ‘Smack My Bitch Up’ and my foot turned leaden. I ragged that ancient old banger to 115, shuddering and groaning as if it were about to disintegrate. 

Our faith was truly vindicated, as we swept shambolic, beatific through the sun dappled valley.

Categories
Reviews

Epistles of Defiance: The Power of Profane Expression in Wicked Little Letters

By Mopsy Peel

The art of female anger has rarely been a subject for delicate inspection, particularly in film. More often, it is crammed into tight archetypes – shrill, hysterical and unreasonable. Yet in Wicked Little Letters, directed by Thea Sharrock, we are offered a rare portrayal of this emotion as something complex and empowering. Based on a true story, Wicked Little Letters weaves fact with flair, turning an improbable tale of scandal and subversion into a rich exploration of female rage, defiance, and the power of the written word.

Olivia Colman takes the helm as Edith Swan: a buttoned-up spinster of 1920s Littlehampton whose Christian virtue is matched only by her insufferable smugness. She is a figure moulded by propriety – every glance a judgment, every utterance calculated. Yet, beneath the starch and rosary beads simmers an anger that will not stay suppressed. Her weapons of choice are anonymous, venomous letters brimming with blasphemies and insults, mailed to unsuspecting neighbours. These are no simple verbal outbursts to be easily dismissed or forgotten. Instead, they are immortalised in ink, transcending the fleeting nature of spoken anger and embedding themselves in the consciousness of their readers. This transference of voice is a potent mechanism. The letters, read aloud by their recipients, remove ownership from Edith while amplifying her defiance. It is a small yet seismic rebellion against the silence demanded of women in this era. The act is, in its own way, a kind of liberation.

The tradition of letter-writing as an outlet for female emotion is nothing new. For centuries, women have turned to the pen to articulate passions too dangerous or unbecoming to voice. In Edith’s case, her repressed fury at her overbearing family and the suffocating norms of her community spills out in scrawled obscenities. It begins as a small act of defiance but quickly morphs into an addiction. Where others might step outside for a cigarette, Edith retreats upstairs, pen in hand, to unleash lines like “you foxy-arsed old whore,” or, my personal favourite, “you mangey old titless turnip”. 

The film presents Edith’s venom alongside Jessie Buckley’s feisty Rose Gooding, an Irish maid whose presence electrifies every scene she graces. Buckley’s accent dances on the edge of the poetic, rolling profundities off her tongue with an ease that both disarms and delights. Rose is everything Edith is not: brazen, unafraid, and unapologetically alive. Her rebellion is not cloaked in anonymity but lived out loud, an enchanting spectacle of fearlessness in an era that demanded women shrink themselves.

The humour in Wicked Little Letters is an art form unto itself, a tapestry of wit and absurdity woven through its every scene. Anjana Vasan and Lolly Adefope, whose comedic talents are already well-cemented (Adefope especially delighting audiences as Kitty in the BBC show Ghosts), bring a vitality to the film that elevates its mischief. Joanna Scanlan, brilliant as ever and fondly remembered as Terri Coverley in The Thick of It, adds her own brand of comedic gold, her expressions delivering punchlines as sharp as the letters themselves. Together, this trio creates a riot of perfectly timed quips and glorious deliveries, transforming the prim 1920s setting into an unrelenting parade of laughter, their modern comedic genius crackling through the tension of a period drama-turned-caper.

The power dynamics within the film’s domestic sphere sharpen this portrait of female rage. Edith’s family is a depiction of repression: a meek, passive mother and a controlling father whose rigid discipline keeps the household in check. It is no wonder that Edith, faced with such stifling circumstances, finds solace in her ink-stained rebellion. In the film’s final act, Edith is arrested – a culmination of her transgressions. But the moment is far from one of shame or defeat. Instead, it is a release, a shedding of the expectations that have shackled her. As she is led away, there is satisfaction in her eyes. For the first time, she is free, not just from her family, but from the burden of maintaining her mask of propriety.

As the final frame settles, Wicked Little Letters leaves us suspended in a paradox, refusing easy catharsis. Edith’s defiance doesn’t culminate in a tidy reckoning; instead, we feel both relief for Rose’s vindication and quiet optimism for Edith. Bridging these two emotional extremes through contradictory empathy strikes me as both a masterful achievement in writing and a testament to the enduring strength of the theme itself, transcending the situation at hand. Edith’s imprisonment, though a downfall by conventional standards, resists tragedy. Her rebellion is not undone by punishment but crystallised in it. 

This depiction of female defiance is refreshing in its honesty. It does not glamorise or sanitise Edith’s anger but acknowledges it as a natural, even necessary, response to her circumstances. Her letters are not polite cries for help; they are visceral, unfiltered eruptions of a rage long ignored. And yet, they are also an affirmation of agency, a refusal to be silent. Wicked Little Letters invites us to consider the power of words, not merely as tools of communication but as vessels of emotion and rebellion. In Edith’s story, anger is not something to fear or suppress. It is something to write, to read, and, perhaps most importantly, to understand.

Feature Image: Jessie Buckley and Olivia Colman in Wicked Little Letters. Photograph: Toronto Film Festival. [The Guardian]. 

Categories
Perspective

The Necessity of Accuracy?

By Sam Unsworth


Ridley Scott has released two major works in the last two years, that being Napoleon (2023) and the latter being Gladiator II (2024). Both have been contentious for their lack of historical accuracy that toy with the audiences’ suspension of disbelief. But I would like to question whether these are fair attacks at what are successful films or are we simply looking for ways to pick apart a once great director whose works are slowly diminishing in quality? I will warn here for spoilers. 

Gladiator II is no doubt a high-octane action thriller but perhaps what made this only a mediocre re-hashing of its predecessor is not actually because of its lack of attention to detail. Now, to start with the most obvious, the presence of sharks in the Colosseum. Quite obviously ludicrous. It is clear that this would be a logistical nightmare now, let alone in Ancient Rome. Yet I think that this is simply too easy a shot to take at Scott, the man behind Alien (1979), who is asking his audience to suspend their disbelief. Does the presence of great whites add a further jeopardy to the games? That if one of the gladiators fell from the boats then they would be killed also? Honestly, yes. I would argue that here Scott is not looking to be accurate – he is purely looking for an enjoyment factor. 

In Gladiator II Scott understands his audience and wants to provide action and violence that is there to entertain, almost like being put into the seats of the Colosseum yourself. If you had watched the first film you would have seen gladiators fighting tigers and each other, so would we ask that Scott just remade this with different characters? The different games, such as the sea battle or the rhinoceros being ridden, made the film interesting for a returning audience, as well as a newfound fan base. Gladiator II is meant to entertain so maybe we should set aside our historian’s viewpoint and enjoy the film as it is, at heart, a fiction. 

However, this, I doubt, can be said for the Roman newspaper appearing before the printing press. These kinds of throwaway inaccuracies are what harms Scott’s film as it is simply unnecessary, disengaging the audience. One of the first attacks I read on the film was about Denzel Washington’s casting; yet, I find it a weak jab at the film. Washington portrayed the villain Macrinius who ascends to the top of Roman aristocracy and was possibly the saving grace of the film, which was riddled with average performances and even more average screenwriting. The argument against casting a black man in this role holds so little water that it can really be disregarded due to the distinction between Roman and Barbarian and nothing more. So, we should also take into account who we listen to when we are told a film is inaccurate. 

In contrast, Ridley Scott’s Napoleon is not a fictional tale. It is a true story with real people and real struggles, hence the inaccuracies do not aid the story but in many ways diminish it. Why was Joaquin Phoenix cast to play Napoleon at both Toulon and Waterloo? Why was Josephine presented as being younger than Napoleon himself? Setting these aside, the inaccuracies do, at times, undermine the genius of Napoleon’s military strategy, especially at Austerlitz. Scott portrays a hilly area with deep lakes where cannons fired onto retreating Russian forces, drowning the majority in the frozen lake. Now, like Gladiator II, this looks incredible cinematically; yet, it simply is not true. Where Gladiator II is a fiction so we can toy with the truth, Napoleon’s story is not. Napoleon’s tactical genius is reduced by fake geography and over-exaggeration. Moreover, the way in which his forces attack in disarray bears no resemblance to the ordered formations of Napoleonic warfare. This is where I believe accuracy matters because Napoleon is, at heart, a biopic about the life of a great person, that, in reality, does not need increasing for cinema, given how impressive a story it is in and of itself. The audience of this film, while also for the masses, would surely have appealed to historians as a homage to a great military leader, yet Scott seems to neglect this core part of the viewership. 

There are times, though, where historical inaccuracy can be done extremely well and to good effect. This is particularly evident in Brian Helgeland’s A Knight’s Tale (2001). In this film, set at a medieval jousting tournament, both the costumes and set design were incredibly accurate, and adhered to the source material of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. Yet, the one distinct difference is in the music. Helgeland and Burwell, the musical director, utilised classic rock music such as Queen’s “We Will Rock You”, Thin Lizzy’s “The Boys Are Back in Town” and AC/DC’s “You Shook Me All Night Long” to create a crowd atmosphere the audience would be familiar with. This is a great example of understanding one’s audience and using inaccuracy to build emotion and allow a modern audience to connect with a wholly unfamiliar world. 

Inaccuracy has its place in historical film, but I find it must be done with reason. Does it evoke emotion? Does it connect with an audience? Does it truly enhance the story? Gladiator II, for all its flaws which are many beyond its accuracy, is arguably made better by its wildly over-the-top display of the Colosseum, much like A Knight’s Tale is enhanced by its modern soundtrack. Yet, in the genre of biopic, I believe Scott takes inaccuracy too far and ultimately it is detrimental to the final work. 

Categories
Culture

Ode to a Pint and Pintman Proper

By Harry Laventure

The Internet. Noun, “a harrowing whirligig of rot”. Defined by example: scroll, Lebron James’ smiling face transposed onto a pumpkin with a spectral version of the song ‘You Are My Sunshine’ playing from the digital wings; scroll, the grinch, coloured blue, enormously excited about a certain kind of patella-themed medical procedure on the following day; scroll, a small dog AI rapping in Chinese; scroll, a rotund young man now known to the world as The Rizzler; scroll, Ian Hawke; scroll, Hawk Tuah; scroll, Talk Tuah; scroll, Talking Tuah. Has the great gallery of gibberish ever had so little wall space? Certainly not. 

After the pinted pretension of a Christmas quiz’s revelry, a friend of mine described influencers as our era’s answer to socialites. Having wept for Madame de Pompadour for a little while, I reflected on the sparkling offerings of the zeitgeist. Are we cooked? Perhaps, but it’s not all bad. I present the panacea: LondonDeadPubs. Real name, James McIntosh. Street, Jimmy Mac. 

Sycophant that I am, it is a labour of Herculean proportions to pin down this cultural aficionado in but a few lines. He is at once a musician, an underwriter, and a journalist, alongside more serious endeavours. Published on Spotify, in the FT, and editing for The Fence, there are many strings to the bow of this Zythophilic Robin Hood of content. Above all else, punctuated by various homages and tips of the hat, one theme has been prevalent in his corpus: yes, the nominative determinism speakst true, his muse is the humble boozer. 

LondonDeadPubs offers the premium service of criticism for every kind of public house, from the shop-conversion cavalcades of quaffage on the estate to the anachronistic debauchery dens of the Dorset village. Spliced between shots of sips and sips of shots, soundtracked by vaguely alienating ambience, Jimmy Mac has flown far and wide in search of the perfect place for a perfect pour. Adorned with a sartorial armoury of herringbone jackets and 70s collars, his quizzical insouciance has peppered pub after pub, pint after pint, with a narration that is at once lucid, referential, enjoyable, and directly informative. Structurally, his arenas of merriment are judged on four parameters by number: ambience, interiors, drinks, and the ever-delightful DPF (Dead Pub Factor). According to these barometers, each inebriation station is ranked and depicted in a fashion that is faithful to their identity, for better or worse. 

From Moranos of Canons Park to Albert’s Schloss of Piccadilly, we meet no conceit or alcoholic martyrdom on this tour. Criticism is humorous but candid. The care and attention to detail of each review coagulates with the frothed collar coherence observable atop a well settled stout. The fact is, Jimmy Mac seems to me the perfect influencer. I sincerely know nothing about him beyond his LDP character. His content is consistent but enriching, niche but entertaining, and it stems from something sincere. This is a man who not only loves to drink, but knows and treasures the very English reverie that is a simple pint in a pub, whatever the context. 

At the end of it all, we must concede the comforts in the anchor of a damp coaster. The concentration of a country’s attitudes to the seasons, bleak and golden; the shadows of sodden-boots on old stone floors post-countryside-walk, whisked away by the glowing fuzz of a cast-iron hearth; or the light chime of parasols in the creaky rattle of beer garden benches. That particular hieroglyph of the pump-badge, and the second sunlight of an IPA’s contents refracted and projected on a table of your choice… I digress.

At the risk of sounding like a git, he is one of the few actively positive things that I have encountered spontaneously through the algorithm’s radical wisdom. I implore you to find him on Instagram or TikTok. 

On the mystical metric known as the DPF, it’s a ten from me. 

Categories
Poetry Uncategorized

Resurrection

By Muna Mir

In January I dreamt you’d been resurrected.

Walking through the woods,

I watched the colours shift

For the first time

When the sun hit your eyes.

The clenching of my stomach, the serpent

Wrapped twice around my chest,

Tempting and stifling. The memory

Of restraint

When the sun rubbed

At your temples. Smooth skin

And your golden hair

Falling over

That temple.

I’d only noticed

The colour of your eyes

The week before.

How often I have regretted

Not noticing sooner, not

Nailing you to a cross

To stare at your eyes forever

Categories
Culture

David Lynch: In Dreams I Walk With You 

By Maisie Jennings

David Lynch (1946-2025) was an American filmmaker. 

I discovered David Lynch as a teenager – I was discovering cult classics, “arthouse” films, Murakami novels, and drinking red wine without grimacing. I watched Blue Velvet and was spellbound, nearly hypnotised. Masterfully, Lynch enmeshes American, white-picket-fence suburbia with dangerous and seductive forces – a distinctive thematic quality across his body of work. The terror Lynch constructs is existential; it probes the fragility of the everyday, piercing the mundane with ostensibly unnatural evil. At the same time, he locates this fear within, arguably, some of the most beautiful shots in cinema, and amongst whimsically playful moments of campy humour. This, I think, is why Lynch’s work, transfixes and intoxicates like a lucid dream and, simultaneously, reverberates in our minds like a terrible nightmare. He undercuts horror with glimmers of hope, offering some light in worlds that seem bereft of it. For me, he completely transformed the way I interacted with art, and taught me that strangeness could be a boundless repository of creativity. 

In an interview with the Guardian in 2018, after the release of Twin Peaks: The Return in 2017, Lynch speaks plainly: “I was never a movie buff. I like to make movies. I like to work. I don’t really like to go out.”. Expressed in typically gnomic fashion, Lynch’s blithe response is somewhat unexpected from one of cinema’s greats. In another interview, he lists the films that inspired him: the works of Godard, Kubrick, Fellini, and Bergman. However, Lynch, delighted by the ephemeral slipperiness of ideas, explains that inspiration is often captured in the “24/7 movie” of life, and not conjured or created by the realm of film. “The whole thing”, for Lynch, “is translating that idea to a medium”. His 2006 book Catching the Big Fish: Meditation, Consciousness, and Creativity, outlines his creative approach: 

‘Ideas are like fish.

If you want to catch little fish, you can stay in the shallow water. But if you want to catch the big fish, you’ve got to go deeper.

Down deep, the fish are more powerful and more pure. They’re huge and abstract. And they’re very beautiful.’ 

It is a characteristically elusive metaphor. Lynch goes on to elaborate that ‘going deeper’ means to access an expanded state of consciousness via Transcendental Meditation, a practice he began in 1973 during the production of his first feature film, Eraserhead. Though Lynch certainly did lean towards the wacky persona he became associated with, his wisdom is gentle and serious. More than anything, Lynch lived for his work – the deeply introspective process of art-making. 

David Lynch was born in Montana in 1946, and his childhood was spent mostly in transit due to his father’s job as a tree surgeon with the United States Department of Agriculture. It was an all-American upbringing; Lynch was a Boy Scout and his family pinged about happily between towns in the Pacific Northwest, Idaho, and Virginia. He reminisces, however, on a particularly striking image from his childhood: 

‘[My youth] was a dream world, those droning airplanes, blue skies, picket fences, green grass, cherry trees. Middle America as it was supposed to be. But then on the cherry tree would be this pitch oozing out, some of it black, some of it yellow, and there were millions and millions of red ants racing all over the sticky pitch, all over the tree. So you see, there’s this beautiful world and you just look a little bit closer and it’s all red ants’. 

This memory constitutes the opening scene of Blue Velvet – a bright blue sky, white picket fence, and pristine red roses subsequently disturbed by the camera’s focus on the squirming insects on the ground below. Lynch’s surrealist Americana had always been implanted from the landscapes of his childhood – doubtlessly his time spent in Spokane, Washington influenced the mystical lumbertown of Twin Peaks – as ever, it is reflective of his ability to catch the big fish of ideas and translate them into works of art. 

In the 1960s, Lynch went to art school in Philidelphia. He found the city to be a sort of industrial hellscape – ‘There was violence and hate and filth. But the biggest inspiration in my whole life was that city’. After his daughter was born and Lynch moved his family to Los Angeles in 1971, it took Lynch another five years to complete his first feature-length film Eraserhead; he dubbed it his ‘Philadephia story’. The success of Eraserhead lead Lynch towards a brief, but phenomenally impactful, foray with mainstream, blockbuster cinema. He was approached to direct Jonathan Sanger and Mel Brooks’ The Elephant Man – a biopic starring John Hurt as Joseph Merrick, a severely disfigured man who became a Victorian object of curiosity. The film was nominated for eight Oscars, and Lynch was hired to create a film adaptation of Frank Herbert’s epic science fiction novel Dune, kickstarting his collaboration and enduring friendship with actor Kyle MacLachlan. Dune was a notorious commercial and critical disaster – Lynch was unhappy with the heavy postproduction cuts of his footage and the experience further alienated him from pursuing a conventional Hollywood career. 

In 1986, Lynch released Blue Velvet – cementing him as cinema’s psychosexual and surrealist auteur. The film also established Lynch’s use of recurring cast members and his small, exclusive pool of creative collaborators. Most notably, perhaps, was his partnership with composer Angelo Badalamenti, who created the dreamlike scores to Lynch’s most iconic projects. After Blue Velvet, Lynch got to work on Twin Peaks, extending Lynch’s visual corpus into prime-time television. Twin Peaks aired in 1990, and since then, I think, it remains the most enchanting, thrilling, and entirely matchless American TV drama. The series follows FBI Agent Dale Cooper (another role played and shaped by MacLachlan) to the fictional Pacific Northwest town of Twin Peaks as he leads the investigation into the murder of high school sweetheart Laura Palmer (Sheryl Lee). Its release and sensational reception marked a decisive turning point in television drama – the deliberate, steady pacing, uncanny tone, and surrealist turns influenced other iconic shows like The X-Files, Breaking Bad, and Mad Men, to name a small few. Although it was precipitously cancelled after the second season, Twin Peaks proved that television could be a challenging, provocative medium. 

Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me, the feature-film prequel to the series, was released in 1992; it cast much darker, devastating shadows than the off-kilter folksiness of Twin Peaks. The film signified Lynch’s refusal to satisfy his audience’s lingering questions, instead, he unearths the true evil within the town – rather than the cosmic, metaphysical forces in the woods, the horror of Fire Walk With Me is found in the home, inside the torment of Laura Palmer. It is a shuddering crescendo of sorrow, and, in my opinion, Lynch’s masterpiece. 

Lynch returned to the psychological thriller in 1997 with the release of Lost Highway, starring Bill Pullman and Patricia Arquette as a couple who receive mysterious videotapes of themselves inside their home. The film is labyrinthine and dense with potential explanations, and potentially Lynch’s coolest, sexiest mindfuck. In 2001, Lynch’s Mulholland Drive further disturbs the conventions of the neo-noir – deconstructing fantasy by layering dreams and illusions. Initially, Lynch has intended for it to be a series and a pilot was shot, immediately cancelled, and then adapted by Lynch into a feature-film. Despite its shaky start, it proved to be another enormous critical success – owing, I think, to its endlessly interpretive nature, and Lynch’s frustration of the audience’s desire for diagetic narration. We become the detective, and Lynch’s neo-noirs do not so much defy interpretation and explanation as they mire us in them. 
In recent years, Lynch had retreated from making feature-films. 2017 saw the release of the third season of Twin Peaks – a powerful 18-hour nosedive into the depths of surrealism, beginning with the endless reverberations of Laura Palmer’s bone-chilling scream. It underscores, for me, how woefully insufficient language is to express the mysterious forces of existence that Twin Peaks reveals and obscures. I was deeply touched by Kyle Maclachlan’s tribute to Lynch in The New York Times; he explains that Lynch was not just a filmmaker, but an artist concerned with languageless mediums, existing within the world of feeling and the unconscious – the deepest depths of a unified, creative ocean. It’s why Lynch’s films are so brilliant. He was a painter, and he was enthralled by the idea that you could add texture, sounds, and smells to an image. Almost, I think, like experiencing the senses in a dream.

Categories
Perspective

Philip Larkin: A Poet for January

By Esme Bell

January does not rank highly amongst the months, in my opinion. We are always torn: between the seasonal inclination to hibernate, lying fallow and snug in bed, and the societal need to be New And Better, to exceed and evolve and produce, to make this year ‘Our Year’ – even though there’s currently hardly any daylight with which to see it.

There is just enough light, though, to read – and I would recommend reading the poetry of Philip Larkin above anything else right now. 

For one thing, his poems are all pretty short, plain-speaking, and easy to find online. For another – despite the lack of any factual links between Larkin and January (who was born in August 1922, and died in December 1985) – his work still exhibits a kind of compelling January contrariness. 

His poetic voice is curmudgeonly, death-obsessed and at times downright people-hating; yet, it is also woven through with a resounding truth and begrudging joy. Through his happy-sad, mundane-resplendent style, he embodies the dichotomy of this season: our mourning for years passed, conflicted with inevitable optimism at the prospect of new, unblemished months.

The oft-quoted poem “An Arundel Tomb– from his 1964 collection The Whitsun Weddings – is a perfect crystallisation of this. It describes the effigies of a man and wife on top of their shared tomb in Chichester Cathedral – specifically the ‘sharp tender shock’ of finding the two statues holding each other’s hands. It goes on to lovingly detail this carved relationship that prevailed through time and successive winters, as ‘snow fell, undated’. Their ‘stone fidelity’ proves that ‘What will survive of us is love’ – touching stuff!

It then strikes us as a deflating shock – a blow, almost – when a quick Wikipedia browse reveals that the two lovers holding hands was not an original feature, just a late Victorian addition. And so the fabled long-time love of the two stone figures was always just artistic dishonesty, carved bluster; there is no such thing as true romance, etc etc; back to January gloom.

Happily, we can reach a middle ground. All art, poetry included, can be seen as bluster, a form of pretense – as life presented in a selective way. It isn’t less powerful or true for not always being empirically “correct”; and sometimes, we have to ignore harsh specific facts in favour of this holistic truth. 

Carved in stone or not, love DOES survive us: any park bench or newborn named after a grandmother can attest to this. And if I ever visit Chichester Cathedral, even knowing the story, I will probably still be moved by a vision of stony companionship – and also the fact that somebody cared enough to add to the statues many centuries after they were first carved. 

And I suppose this is what I mean by equating Larkin with January. His poems are perverse, self-mocking – suggesting sincere visions of loveliness and then wryly quashing them – but suspended somewhere amongst them is the ultimate realisation that things can be both at the same time. January is new and shiny and also old and tired, full of last year’s dead leaves.

There are so many other glorious poems that continue this theme.

“Aubade”, for example, means a ‘song sung at dawn’, and is his most death-heavy poem. It charts the passage of a sleepless night worrying about mortality and is frank and unadorned: death stands ‘as plain as a wardrobe’. The poem holds doubly sad status as it was also Larkin’s last major published poem in his lifetime, appearing in the Times Literary Supplement in 1977; objectively then, it is depressing.

But even staring plainly at the ending of life, dawn can’t help but come, a new day unrelentingly begins and ‘postmen like doctors go from house to house’. It is more about life than death – which can’t deny sunrise or the unceasing passage of letters and parcels, of material stuff – and it finds comfort in the power of the utterly mundane to protect against the morbid.

Larkin can do genuinely ‘lovely’, as well. “Bridge for the Living”, first performed in August 1981 to commemorate the opening of the Humber Bridge near Hull, is one of his most sincere works. It is a personal favourite of mine – as a proud resident of East Yorkshire and also just a reader – it sees Larkin almost enter the guise of a public-service-poet-of-the-people-laureate. Almost: even in this whole-hearted celebration, there is no easy wooing, and a duality of moods is still evoked. 

The whole poem is about the power of connection afforded by bridges, claiming ‘It is by bridges that we live’ – as the Humber Bridge literally joins the counties of Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. But, this is only facilitated by the bridge’s contrasting loneliness, its singularity, and Larkin doesn’t let us forget it; she is a ‘lonely northern daughter/ Holding through centuries her separate place’. There is sorrow in the joy, an acknowledgement of lives that ‘fall short where they began’ – and, as in most of his work, like January itself, dark and light bleed helplessly together.

To a certain extent, Larkin the man can be seen as an extension of this January complex. He lived much of his life away from the public eye, revolutionising Hull University’s library, turning down an OBE, and refusing Margaret Thatcher’s offer to be Poet Laureate in 1984. He was also a serial adulterer, at one point maintaining a relationship with three different women simultaneously. Letters have been released since his death that reveal the depth of his prejudices against just about everybody. 

This article does not seek to defend him or his views, but the fact remains that his poetry – despite the man – can’t help but be redeeming. It grapples so faithfully with the sad, happy, and embarrassing that it becomes tender, purely by dint of loving and careful observation. Or, as Alan Bennett has put it so well, even once you’ve read Larkin’s biography, his poetry still emerges ‘unscathed’. 

And whilst they might not necessarily be the most comforting works, Larkin’s poems still deserve a place in our collective poetic consciousness. They are both armour against and a window into the small blows and smiles of the everyday, and the Januariness of life.

 

What are days for?
Days are where we live.   
They come, they wake us   
Time and time over.
They are to be happy in:   
Where can we live but days?
Ah, solving that question
Brings the priest and the doctor   
In their long coats
Running over the fields.

“Days”, by Philip Larkin

Add Your Heading Text Here